AI code completion, debugging, and development tools
Not all AI coding assistants are created equal. We spent weeks testing the top options across real projects, from quick scripts to full-stack apps. Here's the honest breakdown of what works and what doesn't.
Read more →AI code completion has moved well beyond simple autocomplete. The best tools in 2026 understand your entire codebase, anticipate multi-file changes, and write production-ready functions from a single comment. We spent weeks testing the leading options to tell you which ones are worth your time.
Read more →Claude has quietly become one of the most capable AI tools for reviewing code, catching bugs that other models miss and explaining issues in plain English. We put it through its paces across Python, TypeScript, and Go projects to see if it holds up. Here's our honest take.
Read more →Not every AI coding assistant is worth your time or money. We spent weeks testing the top options to find which ones genuinely improve your workflow and which ones just autocomplete your mistakes faster. Here's what we found. ---EXCERPT---
Read more →Cursor has become one of the most talked-about AI coding tools since its explosion in popularity. We spent weeks testing it across real projects to give you an honest take. Here's what we found.
Read more →AI coding assistants have gone from novelty to necessity for most developers. We spent months testing the top options across real projects to find out which ones genuinely improve your workflow. Here's what we found.
Read more →GitHub Copilot and Cursor are the two biggest names in AI-assisted coding, but they take fundamentally different approaches. We spent months testing both tools across real projects to find out which one actually makes developers faster.
Read more →